Editorial standards
Editorial and corrections policy
Infocare Insights publishes practical guidance for international and bilingual school teams. Our goal is to make each article clear about who prepared it, what evidence supports it and when it was last reviewed.
How articles are prepared
Topics are selected from recurring school questions and Infocare’s documented work across admissions, websites, system integration and technology operations. Authors separate general guidance from product information and avoid presenting estimates as guaranteed results.
Review standards
Before publication, articles are checked for factual consistency, readable structure, source quality, scope, product claims and alignment between visible content and structured data. Dates are updated only when a substantive review or content change occurs.
Sources and first-hand experience
Where a recommendation depends on an external standard, the article should link to an authoritative or primary source. Infocare project examples must identify the school when permission exists, describe the challenge and solution accurately, and avoid unsupported numerical outcomes.
Corrections and updates
Material corrections are made in the article and reflected in its modified date. Minor spelling or formatting changes do not require a new review date. To request a correction, email bd@infocare.org.cn with the article URL, the statement in question and any supporting evidence.
Commercial transparency
Infocare Insights may discuss areas in which Infocare provides products or services. Relevant commercial relationships are made clear through product links and calls to action; editorial guidance should still explain limitations, alternatives and context.